Cases 21 - 30 of 32
GOING v. LAPREL et al
as 2:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS J GOING
Defendant:
ALAYNA LAPREL , NEAL SMITH , JENS BERGENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOING v. LAPREL et al
as 2:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS J GOING
Defendant:
ALAYNA LAPREL, NEAL SMITH, JENS BERGENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PROVIDENCE FISHERIES INC v. RAY et al
as 1:2014cv00022
Plaintiff:
PROVIDENCE FISHERIES INC
Defendant:
LAWRENCE W RAY, DRUCILLA L RAY and CHERRY POINT PRODUCTS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALTER et al v. ROYAL CARRIBEAN CRUISES LTD et al
as 2:2013cv00445
Plaintiff:
DEANN WALTER and RAY WALTER
Defendant:
INTERCRUISES SHORESIDE & PORTS SERVICES INC and ISHERWOOD ENTERPRISES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
WITHAM v. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 2:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
GLEN A WITHAM
Defendant:
ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE , ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS , GUY DESJARDINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENBOW v. TOWN OF WINDHAM et al
as 2:2011cv00361
Plaintiff:
RAY MICHAEL DENBOW
Defendant:
TOWN OF WINDHAM, ANTHONY PLANTE, RICHARD LEWSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENNIS v. LIBERTY et al
as 1:2009cv00373
Plaintiff:
ROD R DENNIS
Defendant:
RANDALL LIBERTY , FERREIRA, OFFICER , PEABODY, OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
