Cases 1 - 10 of 32
JOHNSON v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W JOHNSON
Defendant:
DONALD J TRUMP, FACEBOOK, META and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ADAMS v. WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT et al
as 1:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
HERBERT M ADAMS, IV
Defendant:
WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT, BARRY CURTIS, RICHARD ROLFE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WALDO COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00088
Respondent:
RAY PORTER, CAPTAIN WALKER and WALDO COUNTY JAIL
Petitioner:
BRADLEY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RAY v. BLUESTEM BRANDS INC
as 2:2019cv00425
Defendant:
BLUESTEM BRANDS INC
Plaintiff:
MARY RAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00426
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CASEY et al v. TOWN OF YARMOUTH
as 2:2019cv00392
Plaintiff:
MEGHAN CASEY, THOMAS REINSBOROUGH, MARK REINSBOROUGH and others
Defendant:
TOWN OF YARMOUTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
RAY et al v. NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC
as 2:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
BERNADETTE A RAY , FUN CHEUNG , JOANNA RESLINK and others
Defendant:
NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUOT v. MONTANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES et al
as 1:2017cv00263
Plaintiff:
SAFRON HUOT
Defendant:
MONTANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES, MONTANA SUPREME COURT, DEER LODGE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINCHENBACH v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2017cv00213
Plaintiff:
DALE RAY WINCHENBACH
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
