Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 3:2015cv01447
Plaintiff:
Jessie Wayne Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Monk et al v. Mabus et al
as 3:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
James Cottam, James Davis, Kevin Marret and others
Defendant:
Deborah Lee James, Ray Mabus and John McHugh
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Smith v. Mabus
as 1:2013cv06538
Defendant:
Ray Mabus
Plaintiff:
Melvin R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marquet v. Gate
as 13-3908
Plaintiff:
Anne Elisabeth Kendzior
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Karley Leah Marquet
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Secretary of the Navy and Jeffrey L. Fowler, Former Superintendent
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert M. Gates, Former Secretary of Defense, Franklin L. Hagenbeck and John M. McHugh, Former Superintendent
Marquet et al v. Gates et al
as 1:2012cv03117
Plaintiff:
Karley Leah Marquet and Anne Elisabeth Kendzior
Defendant:
Robert M. Gates, John M. McHugh, Franklin L. Hagenbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mosley v. Department of the Navy et al
as 6:2012cv00493
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Mosley
Defendant:
Department of the Navy, Charles E. Roberts, Ray Mabus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alex v. Mabus
as 1:2011cv01192
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Alex
Defendant:
Ray Mabus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mannion v. Shinseki et al
as 1:2010cv00886
Plaintiff:
Paul Francis Mannion
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki, Ray Mabus and W. Dean Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
