Cases 1 - 10 of 23
DANIELS v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00859
Petitioner:
RAYMOND A. DANIELS
Respondent:
RANDY IRWIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. Stevenson et al
as 2:2020cv00286
Defendant:
Ivan NKA Bong, Heather Butler and Garrett Stevenson
Plaintiff:
Raymond John Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv07155
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND L DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. Dixon et al
as 2:2020cv00102
Plaintiff:
Raymond John Daniels
Defendant:
Edith Dixon and Benjamin Hulen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv60380
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND L DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. Thompson et al
as 2:2020cv00046
Defendant:
Chad Rehse, Billy Thompson and Peggy Byrd
Plaintiff:
Raymond John Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Daniels v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-20796
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND JOHN DANIELS
Respondent / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Daniels v. Smith et al
as 2:2019cv00193
Defendant:
Greg C Jeter, Tommy D Chisum, Tommy R Tobias and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond John Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Daniels v. Lorie Davis, et al
as 19-20642
Defendant / Appellee:
HARRIS COUNTY JAIL, HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BREANNA SCHWARTZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND JOHN DANIELS
Daniels v. Davis -
as 3:2018cv00262
Petitioner:
Raymond John Daniels
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis and Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
