Cases 1 - 10 of 12
HUBER et al v. SMITH et al
as 2:2016cv00265
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND A. HUBER and ANTHONY M. HELFER
Defendant:
CATHERINE SMITH, NED J. NAKLES, NED J. NAKLES, ESQUIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ader v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 1:2015cv00521
Plaintiff:
Douglas Clay Ader
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Waupaca County, Raymond S Huber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DILLNER et al v. PANHANDLE FOOD SALES, INC.
as 2:2013cv01813
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. DILLNER, JR. , ANTHONY HELFER and RAYMOND A. HUBER
Defendant:
PANHANDLE FOOD SALES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
DILLNER et al v. HELFER et al
as 2:2013cv01515
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. DILLNER, JR. , ANTHONY HELFER , RAYMOND A. HUBER and others
Defendant:
HEMPFIELD FOODS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
HUBER et al v. SMALLMAN MARKET, INC.
as 2:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND A. HUBER and ANTHONY HELFER
Defendant:
SMALLMAN MARKET, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
HUBER et al v. LOUIS J. KENNEDY TRUCKING COMPANY
as 2:2011cv01473
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND A. HUBER and DOUGLAS ROBBINS
Defendant:
LOUIS J. KENNEDY TRUCKING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
HUBER et al v. ROYAL BISCUIT COMPANY
as 2:2011cv01428
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND A. HUBER and DOUGLAS ROBBINS
Defendant:
ROYAL BISCUIT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
HUBER et al v. HOSTESS BRANDS, INC
as 2:2011cv01276
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND A. HUBER and DOUGLAS ROBBINS
Defendant:
HOSTESS BRANDS, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
HUBER et al v. DONALDSON SUPPLY & EQUIPMENT CO.
as 2:2011cv00811
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND A. HUBER and DOUGLAS ROBBINS
Defendant:
DONALDSON SUPPLY & EQUIPMENT CO.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
O'CONNOR et al v. HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP, INC.
as 2:2011cv00435
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. O'CONNOR , ANTHONY HELFER , RAYMOND A. HUBER and others
Defendant:
HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
