Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Evans v. Grady County Jail et al
as 5:2023cv00871
Plaintiff: Raymond Curtis Evans
Defendant: Grady County Jail, United States Marshal Service, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Raymond Evans v. Richard Robert
as 10-3132
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAYMOND CURTIS EVANS
Defendant - Appellee: RICHARD W. ROBERTS, U.S. Judge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01085
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Roberts
as 1:2010cv01104
Plaintiff: Raymond Curtis Evans
Defendant: Richard W. Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EVANS v. BLEDSOE et al
as 1:2010cv00696
Plaintiff: Raymond Curtis Evans
Defendant: B. A. Bledsoe, R.w. Roberts and H. Lappins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. BIEDSOE et al
as 2:2010cv01145
Plaintiff: RAYMOND CURTIS EVANS
Defendant: B.A. BIEDSOE, R.W. ROBERTS and H. LAPPINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Evans v. Daniels, et al
as 10-5007
Petitioner - Appellant: Raymond Curtis Evans
Respondent - Appellee: Daniels, Warden, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Evans v. The Attorney General, et al
as 09-1579
Petitioner - Appellant: RAYMOND CURTIS EVANS
Respondent - Appellee: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and E. HOLDER
EVANS v. DANIELS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02123
Petitioner: RAYMOND CURTIS EVANS
Respondent: DANIELS, E. HOLDER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Evans v. Wilner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02333
Petitioner: Raymond Curtis Evans
Respondent: J. M. Wilner and E. Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?