Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BANKS v. MABUS et al
as 1:2015cv01669
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
RAYMOND EDWIN MABUS, JR., SAM ERHART, NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
REID v. MABUS et al
as 1:2015cv01537
Plaintiff:
JESSE WAYNE REID, JR.
Defendant:
RAYMOND EDWIN MABUS, JR., SAM ERHART, POPELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Michael Crooks v. Raymond Mabus, Jr., et al
as 15-5212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Crooks
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy and Dee Mewbourne, Rear ADM, USN, Naval Service Training Command
TRUNK v. MABUS et al
as 1:2014cv02139
Plaintiff:
FRANK JOSEPH TRUNK, III
Defendant:
RAYMOND EDWIN MABUS, JR., ERNEST J. MONIZ, CHARLES T. HAGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-5234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Walter Jackson, Jr. v. Raymond Mabus, Jr., et al
as 14-5224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Walter J. Jackson, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr., Secretary of the Navy and Chairman of the Board For Correction of Naval Records
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Abou-Hussein v. Mabus et al
as 2:2014cv02597
Plaintiff:
Hamdy Alex Abou-Hussein
Defendant:
Raymond Edwin Mabus, Jr and Naval Criminal Investigative Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ray Leonard, et al v. DOD, et al
as 14-5136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Father Ray Leonard and Fred Naylor
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Defense, Chuck Hagel, United States Department of the Navy and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
