Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Vincent Hallman v. Robert Stitt, et al
as 15-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT HALLMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ROBERT STITT
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, RAYMOND LAWLER, MAJOR WAKEFIELD and others
Quevi v. Lawler, et al
as 12-3645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN RICHARD QUEVI
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND LAWLER, SUPERINTENDENT SCI HUNTINGDON and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012mc02763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Richardson v. Raymond Lawler, et al
as 12-2910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND LAWLER and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Watson Poland v. Raymond Lawler, et al
as 12-2958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WATSON POLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND LAWLER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Muhammad Leach v. Raymond Lawler, et al
as 12-2217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUHAMMAD LEACH
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND LAWLER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Melvin Lindsay v. Ray Earlston, et al
as 12-2082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN X. LINDSAY
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY EARLSTON
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
RAYMOND LAWLER, BRIAN CORBIN, JON FISHER and others
Melvin Lindsay v. Raymond Lawler, et al
as 12-1929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN X. LINDSAY
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND LAWLER
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
JON FISHER, BRIAN CORBIN, JOSEPH A. KELLER and others
Carder v. Greene et al
as 1:2011cv01922
Plaintiff:
Marcus Carder
Defendant:
Connie Greene and Raymond Lawler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Todd Wilson v. Raymond Lawler, et al
as 11-3552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD A. WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND LAWLER, DA MONTGOMERY and ATTY GEN PA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
