Cases 21 - 30 of 125
ETIENNE v. SOBINA et al
as 2:2010cv05522
Petitioner:
EMMANUEL ETIENNE
Respondent:
RAYMOND SOBINA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SYNO v. BEARD et al
as 1:2010cv00222
Plaintiff:
FRANK SYNO
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, RAYMOND SOBINA, MICHAEL C. BARON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. SOBINA et al
as 2:2010cv01128
Petitioner:
BLAINE E. COLEMAN
Respondent:
RAYMOND SOBINA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROBERTS v. SOBINA et al
as 2:2010cv04334
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS A. ROBERTS
Respondent:
RAYMOND SOBINA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HUGHES v. SOBINA et al
as 1:2010cv00203
Petitioner:
ROBERT HUGHES
Respondent:
RAYMOND SOBINA, ERIE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Efrain Hidalgo, Sr. v. Raymond Sobina, et al
as 10-2966
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EFRAIN HIDALGO, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND SOBINA, Superintendent, ATTY GEN PA and DA BLAIR
Hector Huertas v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 10-2916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HECTOR HUERTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
RICHARD HALL, NANCY A. GIROUX, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Marcel Cook v. Raymond Sobina
as 10-2917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCEL J. COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND SOBINA, Superintendent
MATTEO v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2010cv00160
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MATTEO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI HOUTZDALE, SUPERINTENDENT RAYMOND SOBINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee Yom v. Raymond Sobina, et al
as 10-2469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE SON YOM
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND SOBINA, ATTY GEN PA and DA SCHUYLKILL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
