Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Reardon v. Lafayette County, MS
as 23-60412
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew Oliver Reardon
Defendant / Appellee:
Lafayette County, Mississippi, Lafayette County Chancery Court, Joseph B. East and others
Reardon v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Matthew Oliver Reardon
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Lafayette County, MS, Lafayette County Chancery Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Reardon v. City of Oxford, MS et al
as 3:2021cv00118
Defendant:
Deputy Courtney Dixon, Lynn Fitch, Lafayette Co Prosecutor Bela J Chain and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Oliver Reardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reardon v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00327
Defendant:
City of Olive Branch, MS-Municipal Court and State of Mississippi
Plaintiff:
Matthew Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Landry v. Garber et al
as 6:2019cv00367
Defendant:
Mark Garber, Damien D Allen and Rob Reardon
Plaintiff:
Louis Landry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J H v. Neustrom et al
as 6:2015cv02525
Plaintiff:
J. H.
Defendant:
Michael W Neustrom, Rob Reardon, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M. v. Neustrom et al
as 6:2015cv02524
Plaintiff:
L M
Defendant:
Michael W Neustrom, Rob Reardon, James M Auzenne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duplechain, III v. Neustrom et al
as 6:2015cv02433
Plaintiff:
Steven Duplechain, III
Defendant:
Michael W Neustrom, Rob Reardon, Lafayette Consolidated Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard, Jr. v. Neustrom et al
as 6:2013cv03236
Defendant:
Michael W Neustrom and Rob Reardon
Plaintiff:
Phillip Howard, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Comeaux v. Neustrom et al
as 6:2013cv00768
Defendant:
Michael W Neustrom, Robert J Reardon, Willis Guidry, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jude Comeaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
