Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Boisvert v. Sans et al
as 4:2022cv40070
Plaintiff:
Sean Patrick Boisvert
Defendant:
Courtney Lynn Sans, James Gaven Reardon, Jr., Allysa Kilmurray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vancelette v. Town of Webster et al
as 4:2021cv40095
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Vancelette
Defendant:
Town of Webster, Patrick Perry, Michael R. Reardon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv30023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Mullane v. Reardon
as 1:2019cv10656
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mullane
Defendant:
Roberta Reardon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Raatz et al v. Idera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10485
Plaintiff:
Lisa Raatz
Defendant:
Idera Pharmaceuticals, Inc., James Geraghty, Vincent Milano and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Chaney v. City of Framingham et al
as 1:2018cv10413
Plaintiff:
Rondey Chaney
Defendant:
City of Framingham , Christopher Hendry , Gregory Reardon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merrifield v. Gussman et al
as 1:2017cv10679
Plaintiff:
Thomas Merrifield
Defendant:
Robert Gussman , Tracey Valentine-Gussman , Anthony C Dearth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sampson v. Reardon et al
as 3:2016cv11817
Plaintiff:
Joshua Sampson
Defendant:
Jamie P. Reardon and Marcus A. Humber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thirdparty_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
