Cases 1 - 10 of 11
POTTER et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv12979
Plaintiff:
REBECCA POTTER and THE ESTATE OF JUDY C. POTTER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kennett et al v. Potter et al
as 1:2023cv20863
Plaintiff:
James Kennett and John Burnett
Defendant:
Rebecca Potter, Phyllis LaBellarte and Sherwood Apartments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Potter v. Florida Bar Association et al
as 9:2017cv80865
Defendant:
State Attorney Peter Antonacci, John Doe 1-500, Magistrate Joy B Scherer and others
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Potter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2016cv61687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2016cv81273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv61687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2016cv80184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2015cv80657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pianka v. DeRosa et al
as 2:2014cv02644
Plaintiff:
Victor Pianka
Defendant:
Charles DeRosa, Unknown Sayer, Unknown Osuna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potter v. J.P. Morgan Chase et al
as 9:2014cv80294
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Potter
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase and Trott and Trott
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
