Cases 1 - 10 of 71
GRAY et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
REGINALD A. GRAY and ONYINYE PATIENCE ONHANMA GRAY
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CHRISTIAN et al v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC et al
as 1:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
JESUS M CHRISTIAN, CAMILA ALEXIA SELMAN and JESUS M. CHRISTIAN
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC, RASIER, LLC, KHALINMANDAKH ICHINKHOROL and others
Cross Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY and FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SHUMPERT v. SORRELL et al
as 1:2022cv03500
Plaintiff:
REGINALD L. SHUMPERT
Defendant:
KEITH D. SORRELL and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01706
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HAYSBERT v. WORD
as 1:2020cv02152
Plaintiff:
Stanley Barral Haysbert
Defendant:
Reginald Word
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATTHEWS et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv00595
Plaintiff:
TERESA MATTHEWS and REGINALD MATTHEWS
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2019cv02769
Plaintiff:
VICTOR JOHNSON, KENNETH WATKINS, JERICUO MISSOURI and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2019cv00137
Plaintiff:
REGINALD SCOTT
Defendant:
WARDEN, UNKNOWN OFFICERS, MUREIL BOWSER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOUGLAS v. USA
as 1:2019cv00289
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
REGINALD DOUGLAS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FALICE v. O'BRIEN
as 1:2018cv02946
Defendant:
JOHN O'BRIEN
Plaintiff:
REGINALD A. FALICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
