Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Revis on behalf of Q.T.N., a minor v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Teonna Revis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Revis v. USA
as 2:2020cv00470
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gary Eugene Revis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Norman v. Rhonda Patnelttli, et al
as 3:2012cv00581
Plaintiff:
Dawn Norman
Defendant:
Rhoda Patnelttli, Boenca Norman, Isabelle Hillard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
REVI, LLC v. Chicago Title Insurance Company
as 1:2012cv00670
Plaintiff:
REVI, LLC
Defendant:
Chicago Title Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norman v. Norman et al
as 3:2011cv00383
Plaintiff:
Dawn Norman
Defendant:
Rhoda Norman, Pat Patnetlli, Lillie Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trustees of The Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund et al v. Revis Engineering, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00578
Plaintiff:
Trustees of The Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and Trustees of the International Training Fund
Defendant:
Revis Engineering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Penion Fund et al v. Revis Engineering, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00227
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Penion Fund and Trustees of the International Training Fund
Defendant:
Revis Engineering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Revis Engineering Inc. v. Safeco Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2009cv00883
Plaintiff:
Revis Engineering Inc.
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America and Alutiiq Global Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
REVI, LLC v. Chicago Title Insurance Company
as 1:2009cv00595
Plaintiff:
REVI, LLC
Defendant:
Chicago Title Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
