Cases 1 - 6 of 6
In re: Bennie Adams, et al v. Richard Michael DeWine, et al
as 21-3330
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOUGLAS L. COLEY, DENNY OBERMILLER, JASON ROBB and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
VON CLARK DAVIS, CALVIN MCKELTON, ASHFORD THOMPSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, EDWIN C. VOORHIES, JR., Managing Director of Operations, ODRC, MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
WORLD FUEL SERVICES (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD et al v. Hansa Heavy Lift GmbH & Company KG ms HHL Richards Bay et al
as 1:2019cv20150
Plaintiff:
World Fuel Services Trading DMCC, WORLD FUEL SERVICES (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD, WORLD FUEL SERVICES EUROPE, LTD. and others
Defendant:
Hansa Heavy Lift GmbH & Company KG ms HHL Richards Bay and Hansa Heavy Lift GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
In re: Angelo Fears, et al v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3149
:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGELO FEARS, RICHARD BAYS, ALVA E. CAMPBELL, JR. and others
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio, GARY C. MOHR, Director, ODRC, DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
as 2:2011cv01016
Plaintiff:
Bennie Adams , Stanley Adams , Tyrone Ballew and others
Defendant:
John Kasich , Gary C Mohr , Donald Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proffitt v. People of County of Shasta et al
as 2:2009cv01015
Plaintiff:
Jerry Proffitt
Defendant:
People of County of Shasta, Kelly Kafeal, M. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bays v. Warden Ohio State Penitentiary
as 3:2008cv00076
Petitioner:
Richard Bays and Richard Bays
Respondent:
Warden Ohio State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
