Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Donald Childs, II v. Boyd Gaming Corporation
as 19-15423
Defendant / Appellee:
BOYD GAMING CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD RICHARD CHILDS II
Child v. United States Life Insurance Company, The
as 1:2018cv02664
Defendant:
United States Life Insurance Company, The
Plaintiff:
Richard Child
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Childs, II v. Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01869
Defendant:
Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc., Caesars Entertainment Resort Properties LLC, Cromwell Manager, LLC. and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard Childs, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Childs v. Boyd Gaming Corporation
as 2:2018cv00316
Defendant:
Boyd Gaming Corporation
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard Childs, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Childs v. Extra Space Storage, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01746
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard Childs, II
Defendant:
Extra Space Storage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Childs, II v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC
as 2:2015cv01342
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard Childs, II
Defendant:
Wynn Las Vegas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
CHILDS v. LAYTON
as 2:2014cv00401
Petitioner:
RICHARD CHILDS
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOHN LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHILDS v. LAYTON
as 1:2014cv01964
Petitioner:
RICHARD CHILDS
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOHN LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Childs, II v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
as 2:2014cv01748
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard Childs, II
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Childs v. Caesars Palace Corp.
as 2:2014cv01571
Defendant:
Caesars Palace Corp.
Plaintiff:
Donald Richard Childs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
