Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Walker et al v. Walker et al
as 6:2020cv00173
Plaintiff:
Samantha R Walker and Richard J Johnson
Defendant:
Christina Vaughn, Renee Walker and CPS Huntsville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ealy v. Griffin et al
as 1:2019cv01630
Defendant:
Brea Griffin, David Clark, Joshua Mathy and others
Plaintiff:
Lamonte A Ealy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Johnson v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-11081
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD J. JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Johnson v. Atteberry et al
as 7:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Richard J Johnson
Defendant:
Barbara L Atteberry, Joshua R. Capps, Kendall T Richerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 7:2018cv00046
Petitioner:
Richard J Johnson
Respondent:
Director TDCJ - CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard Johnson v. Martha Maes, et al
as 12-10973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD J JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTHA MAES, Sergeant, S.T.G., D. OWENS, S.T.G. and M. VENABLE, Sergeant, S.T.G.
Richard Johnson v. PLRA's 3 Strikes Provision, et al
as 12-10950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD J JOHNSON, also known as Richard James Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
PLRA'S 3 STRIKES PROVISION and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Johnson v. Constitutional Question et al
as 1:2012cv00853
Defendant:
Constitutional Question, Mary Lou Robinson's General Order and PLRA's 3 Strike Provision
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. PLRA 3 Strike Provision
as 6:2012cv00603
Plaintiff:
Richard J Johnson
Defendant:
PLRA 3 Strike Provision
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Johnson v. Gerald Goodwin, et al
as 12-40643
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD J JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD GOODWIN, PAUL WHITE and CLYDE HERRINGTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
