Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Bennett v. Colvin
as 5:2014cv00537
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Bennett
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Raffaele v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv04607
Defendant:
Richard A. Brown, City of New York, Peter A. Crusco and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Raffaele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lee
as 1:2013cv05185
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Richard Lee and Sandeep Aggarwal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Lee v. City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv04690
Defendant:
Area Captain Benbow Housing Area-4-upper, City Department of Corrections, ESU Emergency Service Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon v. The City Of New York. et al
as 1:2011cv00624
Hield # 23796:
Police Officer Richard Lee
Hield #20134:
Police Officer Steven Kiriakopoulos
Plaintiff:
Mark Simon
Defendant:
The City Of New York.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cocklin v. Eli Lilly & Co.
as 1:2007cv02669
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Cocklin, Sr.
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Co., Eli Lilly & Co. and Eli Lilly & Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Byfield, et al v. ABC Carpet & Home, et al
as 1:2000cv00984
Plaintiff:
Donovan Byfield , Richard Lee , Johnny A. Guzman and others
Defendant:
ABC Carpet & Home , Jerry Weinrib and Paul Chapman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
