Cases filed in Rhode Island
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Paiva v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00499
Defendant: Rui Diniz, Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Pauline Marcussen and others
Plaintiff: Richard Lee Paiva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paiva v. Coyne-Fague et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00250
Defendant: Rhode Island Department of Corrections and Particia Coyne-Fague
Plaintiff: Richard Lee Paiva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paiva v. Wall et al
as 1:2016cv00267
Plaintiff: Richard Lee Paiva
Defendant: Ashbel T. Wall, Matthew Kettle, William Galligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paiva v. Vohr et al
as 1:2015cv00140
Plaintiff: Richard Lee Paiva
Defendant: Fred Vohr, Louis Cerbo, Edward Blanchette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paiva v. Wall, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00116
Plaintiff: Richard Lee Paiva
Defendant: Ashbel Wall, James Weeden, Audra Russo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paiva v. Wall et al
as 1:2014cv00272
Plaintiff: Richard Lee Paiva
Defendant: Ashbel Wall and James Weeden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paiva v. Blanchette et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00252
Plaintiff: Richard Lee Paiva
Defendant: Edward A. Blanchette, Fred H. Vohr, Ashbel T. Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wilmot v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03296
Plaintiff: Richard Lee Wilmot
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Paiva v. Bansal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00179
Plaintiff: Richard Lee Paiva
Defendant: Tej Bansal and Jose Arias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mikulichek v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02899
Plaintiff: Richard Lee Mikulichek and Richard Lee Mikulichek
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?