Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Langford v. Joyner et al
as 5:2021cv00811
Plaintiff:
Chad Edwin Langford
Defendant:
Ms FNU Boatright, Mr FNU Midock, Ms FNU Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Officers et al
as 5:2019ct03316
Defendant:
Director Inch, Thomas R Kane, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Webster Douglas Williams, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Darien v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2019cv01044
Defendant:
Ervin Ford, Jr., John R. Sullivan, Richard Roe and others
Plaintiff:
John D. Darien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2019cv00059
Plaintiff:
Antonyo A. Martin, Sr.
Defendant:
Inmate John Doe, Correctional Officer John Doe, South Carolina Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory v. Hurwitz et al
as 1:2018cv03605
Defendant:
Dr. I. Negron, Hugh Hurwitz, Dr. R. Lepiane and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kincannon v. Doe et al
as 3:2018cv00821
Plaintiff:
J. Todd Kincannon
Defendant:
John Doe, Richard Roe, Frank Foe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. Greenville County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2017cv00364
Plaintiff:
Rahmad I Norman
Defendant:
Greenville County Sheriff's Office, A J Waterlander, J T Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Simpsonville, City of et al
as 6:2015cv01714
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Simpsonville, City of, Jason Weibel, Justin Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. Osbourne et al
as 8:2013cv01242
Plaintiff:
Rahmad I Norman
Defendant:
Steave Osbourne , Officer Nichols , Nick Futch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Graham v. Murray et al
as 8:2012cv03561
Plaintiff:
Onjela Mildred Graham
Defendant:
John Long, John Doe, Richard Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
