Cases
Gregory Kozlowski v. Gregory Van Rybroek, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1163
Defendant / Appellee: JAMES STRAND, Client Rights Facilitator, Mendota Mental Health Institute, GREG VAN RYBROEK, Superintendent, Mendota Mental Health Institute, RANDY KLAS, Unit Manager, SATU Unit, Mendota Mental Health Institute and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: GREGORY W. KOZLOWSKI
SMC Contracting, Inc. et al v. Stewart
as 3:2017cv00313
ThirdParty Defendant: SMC Construction Co.
Counter Defendant: SMC Construction Co. and Richard Schaller
Plaintiff: SMC Contracting, Inc. and Richard Schaller
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Joseph Stewart
Counter Claimant: Joseph Stewart
Defendant: Joseph Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Kozlowski, Gregory v. Von Rybroek, Gregory et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00478
Plaintiff: Gregory Wayne Kozlowski
Defendant: Gregory Von Rybroek, Paul Lane, Richard Schaller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Szulczewski, James v. Green, M.D., Christopher et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00607
Plaintiff: James E. Szulczewski
Defendant: Christopher Green, M.D. , Donna Katen-Bahensky , Kitty Rhoades and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHALLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00473
Plaintiff: RICHARD SCHALLER
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCHALLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00444
Plaintiff: RICHARD SCHALLER
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
SCHALLER v. SHAW We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00191
Plaintiff: RICHARD SCHALLER
Defendant: STEVEN A SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?