Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Ridgeway v. Western State Hospital et al
as 5:2015cv00125
Plaintiff:
Thomas Glenn Ridgeway
Defendant:
Western State Hospital and Steve Beshear
Cause Of Action: 24 U.S.C. § 1000
Ridgeway v. Marshall County Police Dept. et al
as 5:2015cv00092
Plaintiff:
Thomas Glenn Ridgeway
Defendant:
Marshall County Police Dept. and Steve Beshear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridgeway v. Ford et al
as 0:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
Thomas Glenn Ridgeway
Defendant:
Roger Ford, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Corrections and Steve Beshear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridgeway v. Telle et al
as 5:2015cv00082
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Ridgeway
Defendant:
Larry Jack Telle, Marshall County District Court, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ridgeway v. Telle
as 0:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Thomas Glenn Ridgeway
Defendant:
Larry Jack Telle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridgeway v. Ford et al
as 5:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
Thomas Glenn Ridgeway
Defendant:
Roger Ford, Marshall County Jail, Commonwealth of Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridgeway v. Telle et al
as 5:2015cv00035
Petitioner:
Thomas Glenn Ridgeway
Respondent:
Larry Jack Telle, Marshall County District Court and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ridgeway v. Marshall County District Court
as 5:2015cv00021
Petitioner:
Thomas G. Ridgeway
Respondent:
Marshall County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ridgeway v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
Linda Ridgeway
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
