Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
(PS) Rogers v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Kim Edward Rogers
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Keaton Riley, Jim Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Chocktoot et al v. Arden Glen Healthcare, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02992
Plaintiff:
Desiree Chocktoot, Darneece Veazey, Leslie Johnson and others
Defendant:
Arden Glen Healthcare, LLC, Riley Corbin and Natalie Law
Riley v. Hoff
as 2:2023cv02600
Plaintiff:
Nicole Riley
Defendant:
Randy Lowell Hoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Riley v. Hoff
as 2:2023at01135
Plaintiff:
Nicole Riley
Defendant:
Randy Lowell Hoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Jones v. Origin Materials, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02202
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jones
Defendant:
Origin Materials, Inc., Richard J. Riley, John Bissell and others
Soto v. Origin Materials, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01816
Plaintiff:
Antonio F. Soto
Defendant:
Origin Materials, Inc., Richard J. Riley, John Bissell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
(PC) Riley v. Prudhle et al
as 2:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
Rico Lyntice Riley
Defendant:
Prudhle, Lecky, Bulgery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Ahmad v. Newsom et al
as 2:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Noman Ahmad
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, El Concilio, LLC, Martin Hoshino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PS) Genessi v. Placer County Superior Court et al
as 2:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Siobhan Genessi
Defendant:
Placer County Superior Court, Placer County Child Protective Services, Hilary Trauth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
