Cases 1 - 10 of 59
RILEY v. CMMI INSTITUTE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01262
Plaintiff:
LEIGH RILEY
Defendant:
CMMI INSTITUTE LLC and INFORMATION SYSTEMS AUDIT AND CONTROL ASSOCIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CMMI INSTITUTE LLC et al v. ACME PROCESS GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01214
Plaintiff:
CMMI INSTITUTE LLC and INFORMATION SYSTEMS AUDIT AND CONTROL ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
ACME PROCESS GROUP, LLC and LEIGH RILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HOOKS et al v. GREAT AMERICAN WELDING COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01387
Plaintiff:
GEORGE HOOKS and JEROME DOWE
Defendant:
GREAT AMERICAN WELDING COMPANY, LLC and RILEY POWER GROUP, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RILEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00598
Defendant:
CHARLIE RILEY, JOHN WETZEL, KARAN FEATHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RILEY v. TIMMONS CONSTRUCTION LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00286
Defendant:
RYAN TIMMONS, TIMMONS CONSTRUCTION LLC and PANCHO TIMMONS
Plaintiff:
HARRISON LEE RILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JJK MINERAL COMPANY II, LLC v. MORRIS et al
as 2:2020cv02025
Defendant:
DANIEL M. LINES, RACHEL L. RODDY, JACLYN SERSLAND and others
Plaintiff:
JJK MINERAL COMPANY II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
