Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Andersen v. Riverwalk Holdings LTD
as 2:2015cv00621
Defendant:
Riverwalk Holdings LTD and John Does
Plaintiff:
Dean Andersen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Andersen v. Riverwalk Holdings LTD et al
as 2:2014cv01571
Plaintiff:
Dean Andersen
Defendant:
Riverwalk Holdings LTD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Richard Denis v. Riverwalk Holdings Ltd., et al
as 14-3637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD S. DENIS
Defendant - Appellee:
RIVERWALK HOLDINGS LTD. and BROWN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
Denis v. Riverwalk Holdings LTD et al
as 1:2014cv01341
Plaintiff:
Richard S Denis
Defendant:
Riverwalk Holdings LTD and Brown County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PARTON v. MERCANTILE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00291
Defendant:
MERCANTILE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, LLC and RIVERWALK HOLDINGS, LTD.
Plaintiff:
PHILIP K. PARTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jablonski et al v. Riverwalk Holdings, Ltd. et al
as 1:2011cv00840
Plaintiff:
Geralyn Jablonski and People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Geralyn Jablonski
Defendant:
Riverwalk Holdings, Ltd. , Riexinger & Associates, LLC and Baker & Miller, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frillman v. Central Portfolio Control, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv06408
Plaintiff:
Terry Frillman
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control, Inc. and Riverwalk Holdings, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Tipton v. Riverwalk Holdings, Ltd. et al
as 1:2010cv04677
Plaintiff:
Danny Tipton
Defendant:
Riverwalk Holdings, Ltd. and Stoneleigh Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Frillman v. Riverwalk Holdings, Ltd. et al
as 1:2010cv03792
Plaintiff:
Terry Frillman
Defendant:
Riverwalk Holdings, Ltd. and Northland Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
