Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Bartelamia v. U.S. Bank National Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00877
Plaintiff: Andrea Bartelamia
Defendant: U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT, Quality Loan Service Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Turner v. U.S. Bank National Association We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00735
Plaintiff: Kay H. Turner
Defendant: U.S. Bank National Association, not in it's individual capacity, but solely as trustee for the RMAC TRUST, Series 2016CTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
US Bank National Association v. Brackens et al
as 3:2023cv00906
Plaintiff: U.S. Bank National Association, not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2018 G-CTT and US Bank National Association
Defendant: James E. Brackens, Kim L. Moten Brackens, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Demarco v. Rushmore Loan Servicing LLC
as 1:2023cv10509
Plaintiff: ROBERT M DEMARCO and Robert M. Demarco
Defendant: Rushmore Loan Servicing LLC servicing for U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT and Rushmore Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Carl Meyers v. Reed et al
as 4:2023cv00135
Counter Defendant: Carl Meyers as Substitute Trustee for U.S. Bank National Association, Not in its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2018-CTT, Rickey J. Reed, Carla M. Reed and others
Defendant: The Internal Revenue Service, American Express National Bank and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: Carl Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Fitch, et al v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, et al
as 22-1989
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENNETH FITCH and ESTATE OF DIANNE L. FITCH
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, 266 PUTNAM AVENUE, LLC and others
Defendant: HARMON LAW OFFICES, P.C. and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Boucher et al v. U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT, successor in Interest to Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. as nominee for National Future Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2022cv11894
Plaintiff: Robin I Boucher and Cary D Boucher
Defendant: U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT, successor in Interest to Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. as nominee for National Future Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
U.S. Bank National Association v. Castro Alvarez et al
as 3:2022cv00373
Plaintiff: U.S. Bank National Association, not in its individual capacity but solely as trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2018 G-CTT and U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant: Juan Castro Alvarez, Jr, Paul Kanamu Alvarez, Robert Kanaeaupuni Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pale Horse Realty, LLC v. Bezio et al
as 1:2022cv11705
Plaintiff: Pale Horse Realty, LLC
Defendant: Christine A. Bezio, Douglas G. Bezio, U.S. Bank National Association, not in its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee for The RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Not In Its Individual Capacity But Solely As Trustee For The RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT v. Beidas et al
as 4:2022cv01891
Plaintiff: U.S. Bank Trust National Association, Not In Its Individual Capacity But Solely As Trustee For The RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT and U.S. Bank Trust National Association
Defendant: Bassam Beidas and Hanadi Beidas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?