Cases 41 - 50 of 51
WASHINGTON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2015cv01031
Plaintiff:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant:
ROBERT D. GILMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MANIGAULT v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00192
Plaintiff:
ALANTE MANIGAULT
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, LT. SHEA, L. S. KERNS-BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALDONALDO v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2015cv02639
Petitioner:
HECTOR MALDONALDO
Respondent:
ROBERT D. GILMORE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF _______________ and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TURNER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, BLAIR COUNTY et al
as 3:2015cv00139
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER M. TURNER
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, BLAIR COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and ROBERT D. GILMORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PELZER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv01932
Petitioner:
KEVIN PELZER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT D. GILMORE, STEVEN GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GARCIA v. GILMORE et al
as 1:2015cv00024
Petitioner:
Alexander L. Garcia
Respondent:
Robert D. Gilmore , Kathleen Kane , The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GARCIA v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2014cv06416
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER L. GARCIA
Respondent:
ROBERT D. GILMORE, KATHLEEN KANE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PADILLA v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2014cv00197
Petitioner:
MIGUEL PADILLA
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT D. GILMORE, STEVEN GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JERRY v. GILMORE
as 2:2014cv01190
Petitioner:
BERNARD JERRY
Respondent:
ROBERT D. GILMORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAUMHAMMERS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv01022
Petitioner:
RICHARD BAUMHAMMERS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL , ROBERT D. GILMORE , STEVEN GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
