Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Robert Davis v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 14-10624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS, also known as Clarence Willie-Griffin
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, B. YOUNG, W. DOANE and others
Robert Davis v. William Stephens, et al
as 14-10604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, WARDEN FNU WHEELER, WARDEN FNU BETCHER and others
Robert Davis v. Timmy Ducote, et al
as 14-30461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMMY DUCOTE, ANDY BROWN and MARVIN DENTON
Gallegos v. Cornerstone Builder Supply, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00130
Defendant:
Cornerstone Builder Supply, LLC and Robert Davis
Plaintiff:
Jorge Gallegos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Davis v. Stephens et al
as 1:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
William Stephens, B. Young, W. Doane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Stephens et al
as 1:2013cv00189
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
William Stephens, FNU Wheeler, FNU Betcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Lee et al
as 3:2013cv02419
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Chad Lee, Michael Emfinger, Hilton Griffen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2013cv00914
Plaintiff:
Bryan Clayton Roberts
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Jerry Goodwin, Brenda Acklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Washington Co. et al
as 4:2013cv00019
Petitioner:
Robert Davis
Respondent:
Washington Co. and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
