Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Robert Frost, Jr. v. South Carolina DOC
as 14-6324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT FROST, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DIRECTOR BILL BYARS, South Carolina Department of Corrections, LEVERN COHEN, Warden Ridgeland Correctional Institution and others
Robert Frost, Jr. v. South Carolina Department
as 13-7541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT FROST, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DIRECTOR BILL BYARS, South Carolina Department of Corrections, LEVERN COHEN, Warden Ridgeland Correctional Institution and others
Robert Frost, Jr. v. SC Department of Correction
as 12-7482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT FROST, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BILL BYARS, South Carolina Department of Corrections, LEVERN COHEN, Warden Ridgeland Correctional Institution and others
Frost v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv02520
Plaintiff:
Robert Frost, Jr
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bill Byars, Levern Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2011cv02520
Plaintiff:
Robert Frost, Jr
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Bill Byars , Levern Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Frost, Jr. v. G. Toney
as 08-6411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT FROST, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
G. TONEY, Officer, #03167, Lee Correctional Institution, in his individual and official capacity
Frost v. Toney
as 8:2007cv00108
Plaintiff:
Robert Frost, Jr
Defendant:
G Toney and G Toney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Frost v. Ozmint et al
as 8:2007cv00083
Plaintiff:
Robert Frost, Jr
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Jon Ozmint, Jeffery Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
