Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Stephanie Tozer v. Darby Pennsylvania, et al
as 14-1935
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHANIE TOZER
Defendant - Appellee:
DARBY PENNSYLVANIA, A First Class Township Under Pennsylvania Home Rule Charter, CHIEF OF POLICE ROBERT H. THOMPSON, Individually and In His Official Capacity as Chief of Darby Township, PA Police Department and KEVIN WALKER, Former Darby Township Police Officer, Individually and In His Official Capacity
Thompson v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv51418
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Thompson
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as ILS/3:13-cv-51418
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Thompson
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Curtis Reis, et al v. Federal Insurance Company
as 13-56342
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS REIS, ROBERT BOTHNER, D. GREGORY SCOTT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an indiana corporation
ONUFFER v. DARBY TOWNSHIP, PA et al
as 2:2013cv04208
Plaintiff:
VANESSA ONUFFER
Defendant:
DARBY TOWNSHIP, PA, ROBERT H. THOMPSON and KEVIN WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TOZER v. DARBY,PA et al
as 2:2013cv02005
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE TOZER
Defendant:
DARBY,PA, ROBERT H. THOMPSON and KEVIN WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis Reis et al v. Federal Insurance Company et al
as 2:2011cv09835
Plaintiff:
Michael L Abrams, Robert Bothner, Daniel Jackson and others
Defendant:
Does and Federal Insurance Company
Brooke Capital Corporation v. CBM, Inc. et al
as 6:2008cv01032
Plaintiff:
Brooke Capital Corporation
Defendant:
CBM, Inc., CBM, Inc., Marquez Insurance Agency, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
