Cases 1 - 10 of 17
E.J. et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2023cv03747
Plaintiff:
E.J.
Defendant:
ROBERT JOHNSON, MARIA JOHNSON and GREGORY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01942
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 16-18, JOHN DOE 1-3, JOHN DOE 10-12 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2016cv06174
Petitioner:
ROBERT JOHNSON
Respondent:
WINGARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STEAMFITTERS UNION, LOCAL 420 WELFARE FUND et al v. LIBERTY MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05063
Plaintiff:
STEAMFITTERS UNION, LOCAL 420 WELFARE FUND , STEAMFITTERS UNION, LOCAL 420 PENSION FUND , STEAMFITTERS UNION, LOCAL 420 SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN and others
Defendant:
LIBERTY MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC., MICHAEL A. BURNS, JR. and ROBERT JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
HIMCHAK v. DYE et al
as 2:2014cv07024
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. HIMCHAK, III
Defendant:
DANIEL DYE, CMNWLTH OF PA - PA STATE POLICE, CRAIG BOWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv05581
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHNSON
Defendant:
NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2012cv05322
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, LOUIS GIORLA, STEPHEN MADRA and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
as 2:2011cv35615
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHNSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DEYOE et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv03250
Plaintiff:
AMY DEYOE , ROBERT JOHNSON and JOHN OLSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
