Cases
Robert Wilkerson, et al v. Richard Stalder, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-30142
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROBERT KING WILKERSON and ALBERT WOODFOX
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES M. LEBLANC, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS, in his official capacity, JERRY GOODWIN, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacity and LONNIE NAIL, Lieutenant Colonel David Wade Corrctional Center in his official and individual capacities
Robert Wilkerson, et al v. Richard Stalder, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-31289
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROBERT KING WILKERSON, ALBERT WOODFOX, VICTORY WALLACE and others
Defendant - Appellant: JERRY GOODWIN, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacity, JAMES ARNOLD, Deputy Warden of Security, David Wade Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities, LONNIE NAIL, Lieutenant Colonel, David Wade Correctional Center, in his official and individual capacities and others
In re: Richard Stalder, et al
as 11-30964
Petitioner: In re: RICHARD L STALDER, BURL CAIN, TOM NORRIS and others
Plaintiff - Respondent: ROBERT KING WILKERSON, ALBERT WOODFOX and HERMAN WALLACE
Robert Wilkerson, et al v. Richard Stalder
as 11-30938
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROBERT KING WILKERSON, ALBERT WOODFOX and HERMAN WALLACE
Movant - Appellant: JAMES D. CALDWELL, Attorney General
Wilkerson, et al v. Stalder, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2000cv00304
Defendant: Burl Cain, Paul J Myers, Tom Norris and others
Plaintiff: Herman Wallace, Robert King Wilkerson and Albert Woodfox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkerson et al v. Stalder
as 3:2009mc80303
Plaintiff: Robert King Wilkerson, Albert Woodfox and Herman Wallace
Defendant: Richard Stalder

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?