Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Marquet v. Gate
as 13-3908
Plaintiff:
Anne Elisabeth Kendzior
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Karley Leah Marquet
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Secretary of the Navy and Jeffrey L. Fowler, Former Superintendent
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert M. Gates, Former Secretary of Defense, Franklin L. Hagenbeck and John M. McHugh, Former Superintendent
Marquet et al v. Gates et al
as 1:2012cv03117
Plaintiff:
Karley Leah Marquet and Anne Elisabeth Kendzior
Defendant:
Robert M. Gates, John M. McHugh, Franklin L. Hagenbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sealift, Inc. v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv03073
Respondent:
Hon. Robert M. Gates, United States Transportation Command and United States of America
Petitioner:
Sealift, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Williams v. Obama et al
as 1:2011cv04126
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., Hillary Rodham Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kutner et al v. Leavitt et al
as 1:2008cv01013
Plaintiff:
Reva Lupin Kutner and Sanford Kutner
Defendant:
Michael O. Leavitt, Robert M. Gates, Humana Military Healthcare Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Medical Care Recovery
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv01034
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Stewart C. Hudson, G.W. Bush, A. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
