Cases 1 - 10 of 100
In re: Devin Coleman
as 26-2747
Petitioner:
In re: DEVIN L. COLEMAN
Respondent:
WILLIAM NGWA, Provider at JTVCC, JASVIR KAUR, Provider at Howard R. Young Correctional Institute "HRYCI", SHATYRA HENDERSON-HAMWRIGHT, Provider at HRYCI and others
Quentin JonesIn re: Quentin Jones
as 26-2748
Petitioner:
In re: QUENTIN T. JONES
Respondent:
ROBERT MAY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Copeland v. McCray et al
as 1:2026cv00803
Plaintiff:
Darrel L. Copeland
Defendant:
McCray, Eric Carroll, Brian Emig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. May
as 1:2026cv00696
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Robert May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin v. Eisenbraun et al
as 1:2026cv00472
Plaintiff:
Jason A Goodwin
Defendant:
Eisenbraun, Gregor, Marquise Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Christina Secarea et al
as 1:2026cv00420
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Christina Secarea and Robert May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Decampli et al
as 1:2026cv00107
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Johnson
Defendant:
Anthony Decampli, Sgt. Anthony Decompli, Norman Figouroa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Goodman v. Phelps et al
as 1:2026cv00063
Plaintiff:
Stephen R. Goodman
Defendant:
Casey Phelps, Garcia, Ebwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Webb, Jr. v. Robert May, et al
as 26-1062
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOSEPH WEBB, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT MAY, Warden, ORLANDO DEJESUS, STACEY HOLLIS, Treatment Administrator and others
McGriff v. Horsey et al
as 1:2026cv00010
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. McGriff
Defendant:
Corporal Robert Horsey, Corporal Tyrie Sampson, Sergeant Unknown Thongvong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
