Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
MILLS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03824
Plaintiff: SEAN MILLS
Defendant: POLICE OFFICER FAGAN, POLICE OFFICER SANTIAGO, POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2018cv01443
Plaintiff: LAMONT MILLER
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL SPICER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv05189
Plaintiff: THEO SMITH
Defendant: THOMAS LICIARDELLO , JEFFREY WALKER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGAN et al v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2017cv03494
Plaintiff: ISIAH MORGAN and LEO GARDNER
Defendant: BRIAN REYNOLDS , JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPELLONE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv03149
Plaintiff: ROBERT CAMPELLONE
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL SPICER , PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRISPO v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv02814
Plaintiff: RICARDO CRISPO
Defendant: THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN SPEISER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. LICIARDELLO et al
as 2:2017cv02816
Plaintiff: JOSE RIVERA
Defendant: THOMAS LICIARDELLO, JOHN SPEISER, BRIAN REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02647
Plaintiff: QUINCY THOMAS, JR.
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS LICIARDELLO , ROBERT OTTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv01603
Plaintiff: FRANK DAVIS
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAME v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2016cv01031
Plaintiff: CHESTER BRAME
Defendant: BRIAN REYNOLDS, JEFFREY WALKER, PERRY BETTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?