Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, et al v. Paiva
as 23-1919
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD LEE PAIVA
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS A. PALMIGIANO, WILLIAM J. O'BRIEN, JOHN F. PIERCE and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC DAY, WILLIAM THOMAS, DANIEL SMITH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF RI
Interested Party:
KENNETH WILSON, CHRISTOPHER HADLEY, NORMAN WHEELER and others
Roy, et al v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.
as 17-1108
Defendant:
DAKOTA MINNESOTA AND EASTERN RAILROAD CORPORATION, d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway and SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway
Plaintiff:
JACQUES GRENIER, VARIETE CLAUDE CHARRON INC, PATRICK RODRIGUE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUYLAINE ST-LAURENT, as representative of the Estate of Natachat Gaudreau, deceased, DENISE DUBOIS, LUC LAFONTAINE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
Picard v. Rail World, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00148
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PICARD
Defendant:
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY
Movant:
ROBERT J KEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN RE: MONTREAL MAINE & ATLANTIC RAILWAY LTD
as 1:2015mc00355
Debtor:
MONTREAL MAINE & ATLANTIC RAILWAY LTD
Movant:
MARIO SEVIGNY , MARC-ANTOINE SEVIGNY , LOUISE BRETON and others
Respondent:
DEVLAR ENERGY MARKETING LLC , LARIO OIL & GAS COMPANY , DEVO TRADING & CONSULTING CORPORATION and others
Trustee:
ROBERT J KEACH
Picard v. Rail World, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv08758
Plaintiff:
Robert Picard
Defendant:
Canadian Pacific Railway Company , Devlar Energy Marketing, LLC , Lario Oil & Gas Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chase v. RI Department of Corrections, et al
as 10-1175
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BOTELHO, MICHAEL A. BRENNAN, ALFRED BRISSETTE and others
Movant - Appellant:
PARRISH CHASE
Defendant - Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND
Interested Party:
MICHAEL RICHARDSON, THOMAS WEBB, KENNETH WILSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
