Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Youngs et al v. National General Assurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv01312
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Youngs and Barbara A. Youngs
Defendant:
National General Assurance Company, National General Insurance Company and GMAC Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp24012
Plaintiff:
Inola U. Young and Robert R. Young
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WASHINGTON v. ASBESTOSPRAY CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv63837
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. YOUNG
Defendant:
ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION , GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv90452
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. YOUNG and HELLEN L. YOUNG
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
YOUNG v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv90457
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. YOUNG and TERRY LEE YOUNG
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
YOUNG v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv86623
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. YOUNG and HELLEN L. YOUNG
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
YOUNG v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv65438
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. YOUNG
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., THE BUDD COMPANY, THE BUDD COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
