Cases 1 - 6 of 6
William Davis, II v. Albert Singer
as 14-1999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II
Plaintiff:
J.F.D., c/o William S. Davis, II and ESTATE OF WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, SR., Deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
ALBERT J. SINGER, DANIELLE DOYLE, SYDNEY J. BATCH and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Monica Bousman
as 14-1358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, and (a minor) J.F.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
MONICA M. BOUSMAN, individually and as Juvenile State Court Judge North Carolina, Wake County, ERICK CHASSE CHASSE, individually and as a Juvenile State Court Judge, North Carolina, Wake County, JAMES FULLWOOD, individually and a Juvenile State Court Judge, North Carolina, Wake County and others
William Davis, II v. Albert Singer
as 13-2505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, J.F.D., c/o William S. Davis, II and ESTATE OF WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, SR., Deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
ALBERT J. SINGER, DANIELLE DOYLE, SYDNEY J. BATCH and others
William Davis, II v. Albert Singer
as 13-1649
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, J.F.D., c/o William S. Davis, II and ESTATE OF WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, SR., Deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
ALBERT J. SINGER, WAKE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, DANIELLE DOYLE and others
William Davis, Jr. v. Danielle Doyle
as 11-1418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIELLE DOYLE, Child Protective Services Social Worker of Wake County Human Services, of Cary North Carolina in her individual and official capacities, RAMON RAJANO, Director, Wake County Human Services of Raleigh North Carolina in his individual and official capacities, DAVID COOKE, Manager, Wake County Government of Raleigh North Carolina in his individual and official capacities and others
Davis v. Doyle et al
as 4:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Danielle Doyle, Ramon Rajano, David Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
