Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HERZ v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2020cv01412
Defendant:
MARC ROTHENBERG, INDIANAPOLIS HEBREW CONGREGATION, INC., BILL CLINTON and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HERZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00023
Defendant:
P. FREDERICK PFENNINGER, BERNARD PYLITT, DENNIS SASSO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HERZ v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2018cv03447
Defendant:
P. FREDERICK PFENNINGER, JUDGE MARC ROTHENBERG, BERNARD PYLITT and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HERZ v. SASSO et al
as 1:2018cv02817
Defendant:
RICHARD L. YOUNG, MITCH MCCONNELL, SEAN PERSIN and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HERZ v. RIFKIN et al
as 1:2018cv02120
Defendant:
RICHARD SCHREINER, JONATHAN ADLAND, JOHN HANLEY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
RUDOLPH v. ROSS et al
as 1:2013cv00866
Defendant:
ROBERT RIFKINS and ROBERTA ROSS
Plaintiff:
SHEILA RUDOLPH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
SRIVASTAVA v. JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01848
Defendant:
AFNI, INC., GREGORY BALLARD, SARAH EVANS BARKER and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
RUDOLPH v. RIFKIN
as 1:2011cv01164
Defendant:
ROBERT RIFKIN
Plaintiff:
SHEILA RUDOLPH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Srivastava v. Payne et al
as 2:2011mc00025
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Herz Srivastava
Defendant:
James Payne , Mitchell Daniels , Randall Shepard and others
Srivastava PHD v. Daniels et al
as 2:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
Carolyn H Srivastava PHD
Defendant:
Mitchell Daniels, Randall Shepard, Gregory Zoeller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
