Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Scott v. Muhammad et al
as 2:2023cv04817
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Officer Jabril Muhammad, Sergeant Ricciardi and Borough of Colwyn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
DOUGLAS v. RS-WERKS AUTOMOTIVE SHOP LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03304
Plaintiff:
Christian Douglas
Defendant:
RS-WERKS Automotive Shop LLC doing business as RS-Werks, Nicholas Dunlop, Michael Meldrum and others
Cause Of Action: 73 U.S.C. § 201 Violation of the Pennsylvania Consumer Fraud Act, and all other Acts in the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SCOTT v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
as 2:2021cv04645
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
WHITFIELD v. SELECT INTERIOR CONCEPTS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04329
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
SELECT INTERIOR CONCEPTS, INC., DONALD MCALEENAN, ROBERT SCOTT VANSANT and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
SCOTT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv03497
Petitioner:
ROBERT SCOTT
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JENKINS-BERVINE v. CRAWFORD et al
as 2:2019cv05545
Defendant:
REBECCA SCOTT CRAWFORD, REGIS SCOTT CRAWFORD, RACHAEL SCOTT CRAWFORD and others
Plaintiff:
SHARON M. JENKINS-BERVINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. CHESWICK BOROUGH, PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2018cv00847
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant:
CHESWICK BOROUGH, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Scott v. USA
as 1:2016cv01364
Petitioner:
Robert Scott, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
