Cases 21 - 30 of 33
WASHINGTON v. DORAN et al
as 2:2013cv00277
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Defendant:
KAAS DORAN, MICHAEL MCCLOSKEY, JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2013cv00897
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT., ROCKS and EDWARD J.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Doran et al
as 3:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
Robert Washington
Defendant:
Kaas Doran, Michael McCloskey, James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Robert Washington
as 12-1299
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT WASHINGTON
Respondent:
DA PHILADELPHIA
Robert Washington v. Madlock, et al
as 11-2481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MADLOCK and ATTY GEN PA
WASHINGTON et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60516
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WASHINGTON and EMMA WASHINGTON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , KEENE CORPORATION , NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. Northumberland County et al
as 3:2010cv02080
Plaintiff:
Robert Washington
Defendant:
Northumberland County, Kevin Haines, Todd Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Washington v. Atty Gen PA, et al
as 10-3783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTY GEN PA and MADLOCK, Superintendent
Robert Washington v. Mary Showalter, et al
as 10-3513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY SHOWALTER, B. CORBIN, J. KELLER and others
WASHINGTON v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al
as 2:2009cv05115
Petitioner:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Respondent:
MADLOCK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
