Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Washington v. Northumberland County et al
as 3:2010cv02080
Plaintiff:
Robert Washington
Defendant:
Northumberland County, Kevin Haines, Todd Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Washington v. Atty Gen PA, et al
as 10-3783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTY GEN PA and MADLOCK, Superintendent
Michael Hamilton v. Warden Wilkson, et al
as 10-30842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN WILKSON, WINN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and others
Washington v. Uribe et al
as 3:2010cv01916
Petitioner:
Robert Washington
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe and Edmund G Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Washington v. Mary Showalter, et al
as 10-3513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY SHOWALTER, B. CORBIN, J. KELLER and others
Washington v. Uribe et al
as 3:2009cv02601
Petitioner:
Robert Washington
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe and Edmund G Brown, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WASHINGTON v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al
as 2:2009cv05115
Petitioner:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Respondent:
MADLOCK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Orrick et al
as 2:2009cv02129
Plaintiff:
Robert Washington
Defendant:
Orrick and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Washington v. Tony Hedgpeth
as 09-56129
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
TONY HEDGPETH, Warden
Robert Washington v. Tony Hedgpeth
as 2:2009cv04556
Petitioner:
Robert Washington
Respondent:
Tony Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
