Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Amy Sherlock, et al v. Gina Austin, et al
as 23-55018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMY SHERLOCK, on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor children, T.S. and S.S
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FLORES, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
GINA M. AUSTIN, an individual, AUSTIN LEGAL GROUP APC, a California Corporation, JOEL R. WOHLFEIL, an individual and others
Geiss v. The Weinstein Company Holdings
as 21-1011
Plaintiff:
Melissa Thompson, Nannette Klatt, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Sara Ann Thomas, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Sarah Ann Masse and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy Ashbrooke, Richard Koenigsberg, Miramax Film NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larissa Gomes, Melissa Sagemiller, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Nannette May, FKA Nannette Klatt and others
Defendant:
Miramax Film Corp. and Miramax, LLC
Geiss v. The Weinstein Company Holdings
as 21-1007
Plaintiff:
Melissa Thompson, Nannette Klatt, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Sara Ann Thomas, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Sarah Ann Masse and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy Ashbrooke, Richard Koenigsberg, Miramax Film NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larissa Gomes, Melissa Sagemiller, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Nannette May, FKA Nannette Klatt and others
Defendant:
Miramax Film Corp. and Miramax, LLC
Doe V v. Weinstein et al
as 1:2020cv08490
Defendant:
Robert Weinstein, Disney Enterprises, Inc., Miramax Film NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe I et al v. Weinstein et al
as 1:2020cv05241
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe I, Jane Doe II, Jane Doe III and others
Defendant:
Robert Weinstein, The Walt Disney Company, Miramax Film NY LLC f/k/a Miramax Film Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Andrew Flores, et al v. USDC-CASD
as 20-71813
Not Classified By Court:
LAWRENCE GERACI, an individual, AKA Larry, REBECCA BERRY, an individual, JAMES BARTELL, an individual, AKA Jim and others
Petitioner:
ANDREW FLORES, an individual, JANE DOE, an individual and AMY SHERLOCK, on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor children, T.S. and S.S
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Flores et al v. Austin et al
as 3:2020cv00656
Defendant:
James Bartell, Lawrence Geraci, Tax & Financial Center, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Andrew Flores and Amy Sherlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Sokola v. Weinstein et al
as 1:2020cv00925
Defendant:
Robert Weinstein, Disney Enterprises, Inc., The Walt Disney Company and others
Plaintiff:
Kaja Sokola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Paz De La Huerta v. Harvey Weinstein et al
as 2:2019cv07682
Defendant:
Robert Weinstein, Burton Way Hotels LLC, Miramax Film NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Paz De La Huerta
Not Classified By Court:
Tensor Law PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Doe v. The Weinstein Company Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv03430
Defendant:
Robert Weinstein, Lance Maerov, Dirk Ziff and others
Plaintiff:
Jill Doe
Not Classified By Court:
Jane Doe II, Dominique Huett, Jane Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
