Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CHAMBERS-WHITE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON
as 1:2020cv03140
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WHITE and LATICE CHAMBERS-WHITE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITE-BEY v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2020cv00382
Defendant:
CHRIS A. WILLIAMS, PEREZ, ERIC J. HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WHITE-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. ZATECKY
as 1:2015cv02065
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
ROBERT WHITE
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. ZATECKY
as 1:2015cv02064
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
ROBERT WHITE
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. ZATECKY
as 1:2015cv02066
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
ROBERT WHITE
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOPSON v. ORAL SURGUREY AND MAXILLOFACIAL GROUP et al
as 4:2012cv00072
Defendant:
SAM AGUAIR, AUTO-SMART, MIKE BENNET and others
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE HOPSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 1:2008mc00004
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Petters Company Inc, PCI and others
Receiver:
Douglas A Kelley
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PETTERS et al
as 1:2008mc00194
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS JOSEPH PETTERS, PETTERS COMPANY INC., PCI and others
Receiver:
DOUGLAS A. KELLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
