Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Castro v. Garland
as 22-1386
Petitioner:
ROBERTO CARLOS CASTRO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Castro v. Castro-Harrison et al
as 3:2016cv02731
Plaintiff:
Arturo C. Castro
Defendant:
Roberto Harry Castro-Harrison, UBS Financial Services of Puerto Rico, Luis Blanco-Matos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guerrero et al v. Occidental Petroleum Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv00465
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Cisneros Guerrero , Wilson Fernando Achachi Seileman , Miguel Angel Romero Gallardo and others
Defendant:
Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Roberto J. Castro v. Danros, LLC dba EZ Solutions Collections
as 8:2015cv00835
Plaintiff:
Roberto J Castro
Defendant:
Danros, LLC
USA v. Roberto Castro
as 13-50577
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERTO NICOLAS CASTRO
In re: Roberto Castro v. TDCJ
as 13-20683
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERTO C. CASTRO
Respondent:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
De Leon et al v. Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02740
Defendant:
Robert Burkett, Matthew Windorski and Burkett's Pool Plastering, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose de Jesus Urzua , Melkisedec Barrera , Luis Gallo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
urzua et al v. burkett et al
as 2:2012at01445
Defendant:
robert burkett, matthew windorski and Burkett's Pool Plastering Inc
Plaintiff:
Jose de Jesus urzua, Melkisedec barerra , Luis Gallo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Roberto Castro v. USA
as 12-72570
Petitioner:
ROBERTO NICOLAS CASTRO
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CASTRO v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv73706
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO A. CASTRO
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
