Cases 1 - 10 of 3,462
(HC) Robinson v. Pettijohn
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
Gareth Warren Robinson
Respondent:
Lindy Pettijohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1324 Aliens: Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
BC Dental, Inc., et al. v. Robinson Helicopter Company, et al.
as 24-2892
Plaintiff:
BC DENTAL, INC., an Indiana corporation and STARR INDEMNITY AND LIABILITY COMPANY
Defendant:
ROBINSON HELICOPTER COMPANY, a California Corporation, HBD INDUSTRIES, INC., an Ohio corporation and HBD/THERMOID, INC., an Ohio Corporation
Robinson v. TCP Global Inc.
as 2:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
Lavell C Robinson
Defendant:
TCP Global Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Quinn Bass v. State of California et al
as 5:2024cv00937
Plaintiff:
Quinn Bass
Defendant:
State of California, CA. Governor Gavin Newsom, County of San Bernardino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Brown et al v. Pacific Market International LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Mackenzie Brown, Meiling Robinson, Shea Ritchie and others
Defendant:
Pacific Market International LLC and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Welch v. Hicks, et al.
as 24-2633
Plaintiff:
KENTRELL D WELCH
Defendant:
J HICKS, IHAN AZZAM, HANF and others
Stuart Robinson v. Clise Properties, Inc.
as 24-2604
Plaintiff:
BARBARA A. STUART ROBINSON
Defendant:
CLISE PROPERTIES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
