Cases 31 - 40 of 366
DENT v. MORRIS et al
as 5:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILSON DENT
Defendant:
TIMOTHY J. MORRIS, DARREN SMITH, YISLEIDY D. MINAYA-VARGAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBINSON v. DOE et al.
as 3:2021cv00210
Plaintiff:
DARIUS ROBINSON
Defendant:
LIUTENANT JANE DOE, SEGREGATION OFFICER SALYARD, MEDICAL PROVIDER GAUDET, D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BULLARD v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2021cv05158
Plaintiff:
JAMES BULLARD
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL, DEPUTY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Northumberland County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv01905
Plaintiff:
Michael James Robinson
Defendant:
Northumberland County Jail, Lt. Joe Shurock and Sgt. Bart Shuman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv04844
Plaintiff:
HARVEY MIGUEL ROBINSON, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv04715
Plaintiff:
ANTYANE ROBINSON
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2021cv04718
Plaintiff:
REGINALD YOUNG
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, LEO DUNN, VICTOR W. WILLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04655
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
ROBINSON v. RESPONDING NURSE et al
as 2:2021cv04398
Plaintiff:
DONTE PACE ROBINSON
Defendant:
RESPONDING NURSE, CORRECTION OFFICIERS (1-4), LIEUTENANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. SALAMON et al
as 2:2021cv01320
Petitioner:
TROY ROBINSON
Respondent:
BOBBI JO SALAMON and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
