Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 896
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00302
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Robinson v. Harvanek
as 23-5036
Petitioner / Appellant: KEITH EARL ROBINSON
Respondent / Appellee: KAMERON HARVANEK
Robinson v. Whitten
as 4:2023cv00123
Petitioner: Byron Robinson
Respondent: Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. Robinson, et al
as 23-1080
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARY C. AUSTIN
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN STEWART ROBINSON and SUSAN KAY ROBINSON
Robinson v. Reventics, LLC
as 1:2023cv00659
Plaintiff: Preference Robinson
Defendant: Reventics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Henderson v. Reventics, LLC
as 1:2023cv00586
Interested Party: Paula Henderson
Defendant: Reventics, LLC
Consolidated Plaintiff: Daniel Jones, Carol Goldberg, Vahram Haroutunian and others
Consolidated Defendant: Regional One Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
O'Neill v. Beauty Lab and Laser et al
as 2:2023cv00160
Plaintiff: GAVIN O'NEILL
Defendant: BEAUTY LAB AND LASER LLC, HEATHER GAY, ANDREA ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Jaquez v. Dallis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00054
Plaintiff: Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant: Johnny Dallis, Silvia Holmes, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Babakr v. Fowles, et al
as 23-3026
Plaintiff / Appellant: MUZAFAR BABAKR
Defendant / Appellee: DR. JACOB T. FOWLES, DR. DOROTHY M. DALEY, DR. STEVEN W. MAYNARD-MOODY and others
Robinson v. Payne
as 5:2023cv03038
Petitioner: Michael A. Robinson
Respondent: Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?