Cases 71 - 80 of 113
Grady, et al v. SSAB Iowa Inc
as 3:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Christopher Grady , Casey Robinson, Jr , Michael W Fowler and others
Defendant:
SSAB Iowa, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Robinson v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00066
Petitioner:
Joseph Eugene Robinson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv03007
Defendant:
Gail Marie Robinson and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv02089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jefferson et al v. Per Mar Security Services et al
as 3:2012cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jacob Jefferson , Rhonda Buick , Mike Richards and others
Defendant:
Per Mar Security Services, Michael Duffy, Steven Sabatke and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Robinson v. USA
as 4:2012cv00252
Petitioner:
Tara Loret Robinson
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
West v. Palmer et al
as 5:2012cv04059
Plaintiff:
Cory Blake West
Defendant:
Charles Palmer, Elizabeth Robinson, Karen Muelhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
William L. Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2012cv02024
Plaintiff:
Joanne D Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ashenbrenner v. Smith et al
as 4:2012cv00085
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Ashenbrenner
Defendant:
Mark Smith , Daniel T. Fell , Eighth Judicial District Department of Correctional Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
