Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Actavis, plc et al
as 1:2015cv10083
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Defendant:
Actavis, plc, Forest Laboratories LLC, Merz GmbH & Co. KGaA. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re Namenda Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2015cv07488
Defendant:
Merz GmbH & Co. KGaA., Actavis, plc, Forest Laboratories LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JM Smith Corporation On behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Smith Drug Company
Interested Party:
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd.
Not Classified By Court:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
United States Of America v. Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
as 1:2015cv05219
Defendant:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 842
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Biogen Idec U.S. Corporation
as 6:2015cv06388
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Defendant:
Biogen Idec U.S. Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG et al
as 3:2014cv00485
Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Cause Of Action: MDL 2516 In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02516
Defendant:
Teva Women's Health, Inc., Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
In Re:
Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Pirelli Armstrong Retiree Medical Benefits Trust, Operating Engineers Local 312 Health and Welfare Trust, A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Buildings Trade Welfare Plan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company
Claimant:
Lonny DiTella
Interested Party:
Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc., PAR Pharmaceutical, Inc., Aetna Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Generic Pharmaceutical Association
Cause Of Action: MDL 2516 In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust Litigation
Meijer, Inc. v. Ferring B.V.
as 14-215
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. and others
Appellant:
Humana Inc., Aetna Inc. and WellPoint Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Ferring B.V. and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Objector - Appellant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts and others
Meijer, Inc. et al v. Ferring B.V. et al
as 7:2005cv02237
Plaintiff:
Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc. and Ronald L. Seamon
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc., Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company, Inc., Vista Healthplan, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Helen Seamon
Defendant:
Ferring B.V., Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Third Party Payors
Not Classified By Court:
Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
In Re: Oxycontin Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2004md01603
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Purdue Pharma, Purdue Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Steve White, City of New York, Melinda Wittefeldt and others
Counter Defendant:
Purdue Pharmaceuticals L.P. and Purdue Pharma L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Noramco Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Varam, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Impax Laboratories, Inc.
Petitioner:
James R. Dugan, II
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
